The comparative study between treatment with Cryoprecipitate and recombinant Factor VIII in Hemophilia in children
1 Department of Pediatrics, Nicolae Testemițanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Chişinău, Republic of Moldova.
2 Valentin Ignatenco Municipal Children's Clinical Hospital, Chişinău, Republic of Moldova.
3 Mother and Child Institute, Chişinău, Republic of Moldova.
Research Article
World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences, 2024, 20(01), 483–493.
Article DOI: 10.30574/wjbphs.2024.20.1.0793
Publication history:
Received on 07 September 2024; revised on 15 October 2024; accepted on 17 October 2024
Abstract:
Introduction: Hemophilia A is a genetic disorder caused by a deficiency or absence of coagulation Factor VIII, leading to impaired blood clotting and prolonged bleeding, especially into joints and muscles. Without appropriate treatment, recurrent bleeding can result in chronic joint damage and disability. Traditionally, Cryoprecipitate, a blood product containing concentrated clotting factors, has been used to manage bleeding episodes in patients with Hemophilia A. However, with advancements in biotechnology, recombinant Factor VIII, a synthetic product, has become an alternative. Recombinant Factor VIII eliminates the risks associated with blood-derived products, such as viral transmission, and offers more consistent dosing and availability. Despite these advantages, recombinant therapies are significantly more expensive. This study seeks to compare the clinical efficacy, safety of Cryoprecipitate versus recombinant Factor VIII in pediatric patients with Hemophilia A, providing critical insights for optimal management strategies.
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes, safety of Cryoprecipitate versus recombinant Factor VIII in the management of children diagnosed with Hemophilia A.
Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 32 pediatric patients diagnosed with Hemophilia A, treated either with Cryoprecipitate or recombinant Factor VIII. Clinical data were collected on bleeding frequency, Factor VIII recovery. Statistical analyses were conducted to determine significant differences between the two groups.
Results: The study demonstrated that treatment with recombinant Factor VIII resulted in significantly improved clinical outcomes compared to Cryoprecipitate. In the group treated with recombinant Factor VIII, patients required scheduled hospitalizations for routine follow-up and management, with no reports of acute bleeding episodes during these admissions. This contrasts sharply with the Cryoprecipitate group, where all hospitalizations were precipitated by acute bleeding events, necessitating urgent intervention.
Conclusions: Recombinant Factor VIII demonstrates superior efficacy in managing Hemophilia A in children compared to Cryoprecipitate. Recombinant therapy provides better clinical outcomes, justifying its use in modern treatment protocols.
Keywords:
Crioprecipitat; Hemophilia; Factor VIII; Factor VIII recombinat
Full text article in PDF:
Copyright information:
Copyright © 2024 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0